sponsored by PEFA, ix, 1 Support for Improvement in Governance and Management. See EC and OECD Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern Europe (SIGMA) Swedish International Development Authority, 82

Tanzania

coordination among agencies in, 57

government-led assessment,

17-18, 51, 61, 79,

110bA2.4 implementation of assessment

recommendations in, 65 unrealistic demands placed on,

Task Force on the Harmonization of Donor Practices (OECD Development Assistance Committee), 50,

57, 82

taxation, lack of coverage of, 46

transparency, 33-34

See also governance principles; IMF Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes of Fiscal Transparency (Fiscal

ROSCs)

CFAAs looking at, 42 IMFs Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency, 20,

Turkey, 41, 64, 73я1, 82, 84

2AC and EC audits, 92

Uganda

DIFD and monitoring of fiduciary risk in, 95

duplication of World Bank missions in, 50

government-led PER, 18, 80

participatory CFAA, 51 U.K. Department for International Development. See DFID assessments of fiduciary risk UNDP CONTACT Guidelines, 25n2, 104bA2.2

description of, 99-100

EC Audits development from,

modular approach of, 68 questionnaires and checklists,

use of, 24, 25*1, 68 records management under,

United Nations Development Programme CFAAs, collaboration on, 82

CONTACT. See UNDP CONTACT Guidelines

World Bank

See also Country Financial Accountability Assessments (CFAAs); Country Procurement Assessment Reports (CPARs); headings below starting with World Bank

Africa Region, use of checklist,

coordination with IMF, need to improve, 52, 54-55, 62

coordination within, need to improve, 57-63

coordination with other large partner development agencies, need to improve, 56

Country Analytic Website, 53

duplication of missions in Uganda, 50

Fiduciary Review, 73я1

first loan from, 6я4

Governance Operations

Progress Indicators (GOPIs), use of, 65

Institutional and Governance Reviews (IGRs), use of, 42, 64-65, 82

need for other agencies to rely on analysis of, 53

online access to information of,

Quality Assurance Group. See quality control of assessments

terminology of, causing confusion, 62-63

working group (with IMF) on collaborative public expenditure work, 68-69 World Bank-IMF Public Expenditure Tracking Assessments and Action Plans for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries

(HIPC AAPs), 1, 15,

104M2.2

accountability increased by, 37,

benchmarks used by, 21-22,

111Ш.5 description of, 21-22, 87-90 experienced staff used for, 47я3 interagency consultation, need

to improve, 54

questionnaires, use of, 24, 25*1 revision of guidelines, xiii, 22,

scope and range of, 115*A3.1 as secondary instruments, 40 standardized structure of, 40 as successful collaboration

between agencies, 53 updating of, 65 World Bank Public Expenditure

Reviews (PERs), 1, 15,

104M2.2

background of, 4

combining with CFAAs into single assessment instrument, 61

consultation with nongovernment entities as part of, 37

coordination within World Bank, need to improve,

57-63

description of, 17-18, 77-80 draft guidelines for, 38, 41, 59,

62, 79

government-led PERs, 17, 41,

79-80, 110Ш.4 government participation in

process, 36 institutional considerations and,

less frequent use of, 41 modular approach recommended for, 67 overlap with other instruments,

xiii, 41, 45, 51, 58

as primary instruments, 40 Public Sector Governance

Board as responsible for, 78 scope and range of, 34, 41, 45,

78, 115*A3.1

significance of, 36 skills of teams conducting, 66-67

taxes inadequately covered by, 46

World Bank Public Investment Reviews, 4